VARIATIONS IN COMPOSITION, PETROLEUM POTENTIAL AND KINETICS OF ORDOVICIAN – MIOCENE TYPE I AND TYPE I-II SOURCE ROCKS (OIL SHALES): IMPLICATIONS FOR HYDROCARBON GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
H. I. Petersen+*, J. A. Bojesen-Koefoed* and A. Mathiesen*
*Geological Survey of 
+ corresponding author: hip@geus.dk
Lacustrine and marine oil shales with Type I and Type I-II kerogen constitute
  significant petroleum source rocks around the world. Contrary to common belief,
  such rocks show considerable compositional variability which influences their
  hydrocarbon generation characteristics. A global set of 23 Ordovician – Miocene
  freshwater and brackish water lacustrine and marine oil shales has been studied
  with regard to their organic composition, petroleum potential and generation
  kinetics. In addition their petroleum generation characteristics have been modelled.
  The oil shales can be classified as lacosite, torbanite, tasmanite and kukersite. They are thermally immature. Most of the shales
  contain >10 wt% TOC and the highest sulphur contents are recorded in the
  brackish water and marine oil shales. The kerogen is sapropelic
  and is principally composed of a complex of algal-derived organic matter in
  the form of: (i) telalginite (Botryococcus-,
  Prasinophyte- (Tasmanites?)
  or Gloeocapsomorpha-type); (ii) lamalginite
  (laminated, filamentous or network structure derived from Pediastrum-
  or Tetraedron-type algae, from dinoflagellate/acritarch
  cysts or from thin-walled Prasinophyte-type algae);
  (iii) fluorescing amorphous organic matter (AOM) and (iv) liptodetrinite.
  High atomic H/C ratios reflect the hydrogen-rich Type I and Type I-II kerogen,
  and Hydrogen Index values generally >300 mg HC/g TOC and reaching nearly
  800 mg HC/g TOC emphasise the oil-prone nature of the oil shales. The kerogen
  type and source rock quality appear not to be related to age, depositional environment
  or oil shale type. Therefore, a unique, global activation energy (Ea) distribution
  and frequency factor (A) for these source rocks cannot be expected.  The differences
  in kerogen composition result in considerable variations in Ea-distributions
  and A-factors. Generation modelling using custom kinetics and the known subsidence
  history of the 
JPG Home (opens in this window)